SpaceX Pad Abort Test
SpaceXCited 8× on HN, 2015–2018
demo · general · 2015–2018 on HN
A short SpaceX video of the Dragon 2 pad abort test, in which the capsule's thrusters fire to carry it away from the launch pad. It also shows the pad deluge system.
HN commenters cite it as evidence that Dragon's built-in launch escape system works and that a failed launch need not kill the crew.
Up next
11 mo on HNLight Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
11 HN recommender · 2021–2026
9 mo on HNThe Solar Gravitational Lens will Map Exoplanets. Seriously.
Launch Pad Astronomy
10 HN recommender · 2020–2025
7 mo on HN34C3 - The Ultimate Apollo Guidance Computer Talk
media.ccc.de
9 HN recommender · 2018–2025
6 mo on HNFalcon Heavy Test Flight
SpaceX
4 HN recommender · 2018–2026
7 mo on HNI Was SCARED To Say This To NASA... (But I said it anyway) - Smarter Every Day 293
SmarterEveryDay
9 HN recommender · 2023–2025
8 mo on HNStarbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 1 // Summer 2021]
Everyday Astronaut
11 HN recommender · 2021–2024
5 mo on HNCarl Sagan - Pale Blue Dot
carlsagandotcom
5 HN recommender · 2011–2026
6 mo on HNApollo Guidance Computer Part 1: Restoring the computer that put man on the Moon
CuriousMarc
8 HN recommender · 2019–2024
5 mo on HNDr. Robert Zubrin with a brilliant answer to "Why Should We Go To Mars?"
Jamin Gray
3 HN recommender · 2016–2021
6 mo on HNThe REAL Possibility of Mapping Alien Planets!
PBS Space Time
4 HN recommender · 2023–2024
6 mo on HNHow Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?
Everyday Astronaut
6 HN recommender · 2020–2023
6 mo on HNOrbital Rings
Isaac Arthur
4 HN recommender · 2017–2025
8 comments from Hacker News
SpaceX's crewed Dragon is the escape system. It's built into the capsule, and has been successfully tested. ▶ this video The BFR, to my knowledge, lacks one. Not sure if Musk has commented on that; I'd imagine his likely argument is that airliners don't either.
I think the more relevant videos are: Pad abort test: ▶ this video Pad abort test (POV): link Stream of the same test: link
Actually they specifically plan to load astronauts before fueling begins. If they're in the capsule the launch escape system (LES)[1] can propel them away from any on-pad disaster; not so if they're still walking across the gantry. That said, NASA has raised concerns about loading crew pre-fueling as part of the NASA-SpaceX Commercial Crew development contract (CCDev). [1] Here's a video of the LES test for Dragon 2: ▶ this video
The point of those systems was to limit damage from vibration and rocket exhaust on a normal launch, not to allow the pad to withstand an explosion. (And SpaceX does have them as well; the pad deluge system is more visible than usual in this video of the Dragon pad-abort test, which was conducted at the same launch pad they use for Falcon 9s, though without the rocket itself or any of its mobile support equipment: ▶ this video -- the large streams of water kick in a few seconds before the Dragon abort thrusters kick off.)
A failed launch does not necessarily imply death. ▶ this video However, your point stands. Space travel will never catch on if it combines "Extreme Sport" mortality rates with C-level costs.
Since they don't have to deal with the insulation issues like the shuttle did, the most dangerous phase of flight for a crew is during launch. Last Spring, SpaceX demo'ed their launch abort system which in theory should be able to protect the astronauts against any launch problems; ▶ this video
They also need the parachutes because if there is an emergency during launch, the thrusters will be used to separate the capsule from the launch vehicle. They demonstrated this with their pad abort test: ▶ this video Perhaps later this year we will also see an in-flight abort test, which will be very exciting.
I'm assuming NASA is pretty confident in SpaceX's SuperDraco thrusters after the unmanned pad abort test [1]. With regards to the second comment, I can find out if you're interested. [1] ▶ this video