Avi Bryant demos Dabble db
Tavis Rudd2 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2014–2023
demo · general · 2014–2023 on HN
Avi Bryant demos Dabble DB, a web-based spreadsheet-like database for building apps without code. It shows how users can model and relate data through a smooth interface.
HN points to it as a lost example of intuitive low-code tooling, and as inspiration for newer products.
Up next
7 mo on HNImmigration, World Poverty and Gumballs
NumbersUSA
7 HN recommender · 2013–2024
2 mo on HNTable Saw Safety: My Accident and How to Avoid Your Own
MrFixItDIY
2 HN recommender · 2018–2020
8 mo on HNBreaking the x86 Instruction Set
Black Hat
9 HN recommender · 2017–2022
11 mo on HN"Testing Distributed Systems w/ Deterministic Simulation" by Will Wilson
Strange Loop Conference
12 HN recommender · 2014–2024
11 mo on HNThe Value of Values with Rich Hickey
InfoQ
10 HN recommender · 2014–2023
9 mo on HNAWS re:Invent 2018: Amazon DynamoDB Deep Dive: Advanced Design Patterns for DynamoDB (DAT401)
Amazon Web Services
12 HN recommender · 2019–2025
9 mo on HN"Turning the database inside out with Apache Samza" by Martin Kleppmann
Strange Loop Conference
9 HN recommender · 2015–2025
7 mo on HNConflict Resolution for Eventual Consistency • Martin Kleppmann • GOTO 2016
GOTO Conferences
3 HN recommender · 2017–2020
6 mo on HN01 - Course Introduction & Relational Model (CMU Databases Systems / Fall 2019)
CMU Database Group
6 HN recommender · 2020–2023
6 mo on HNIntroduction to NoSQL • Martin Fowler • GOTO 2012
GOTO Conferences
6 HN recommender · 2015–2021
5 mo on HNRich Hickey rants about HttpServletRequest in 1080p: Death By Specificity from Clojure Made Simple
Fred Overflow
5 HN recommender · 2020–2026
6 mo on HNTigerStyle! (Or How To Design Safer Systems in Less Time) by Joran Dirk Greef
TigerBeetle
2 HN recommender · 2023–2025
6 comments from Hacker News
A good example in this space was DabbleDB[1], a low-code environment for producing web apps that did CRUD type stuff. Their original video demo: ▶ this video I was pretty impressed when it came out. The UI was very intuitive, and it did a better job with things like table relations than it's competitors. They were also releasing new features based on requests faster than what I typically saw. It happened to have used the Seaside web framework mentioned in the article. Sadly, Twitter purchased it and shut it down...I assume they just wanted the team and not the product. [1] link
DabbleDB, this YouTube video gives a great introduction to this online spreadsheet-like database. Sadly they were bought out by Twitter, never to be seen again. ▶ this video
I've tried a lot of these tools. The trouble is that things go extremely well until you hit a wall. With no way to extend them with something like freeform code, the wall doesn't move. The best ones, then, tend to be the ones that have been around long enough, or had enough foresight to have covered various corner cases. The other issue is that most of them have "per user / per month" pricing, which doesn't work for many use cases. Things like, for example, an applicant tracking app. If you use the functionality to a high degree, every job applicant is another end user license. Two of the better ones: link & link Other ones I've seen: link , link , link , link , link , link , link , link , link One of the more promising ones was DabbleDB. Twitter acquihired them and shut the tool down. It had a very smooth UI: ▶ this video
Center of Complex Interventions | First Frontend Engineer | Remote (forever) | Full Time | Open Source We're looking for our first frontend engineer to help build a brand new open source product that helps users of all skill levels store, manipulate, get insights from, and collaborate with others on their data. We are heavily inspired by Dabble DB ( ▶ this video ). Our team is based out of the nonprofit Center of Complex Interventions and we are advised by Joi Ito and Reid Hoffman. In addition to great technical skills, we are looking for someone who is an excellent communicator, proactive, product-minded, excited about making somthing new from scratch (with all the collaboration and iteration that entails) and interested in building an open source community around a product. Full job description: link Apply here: link Feel free to email me at kriti<at>centerofci<dot>org if you have any questions. Mention that you saw the HN post.
Center of Complex Interventions | Frontend Engineer, Product Designer | REMOTE | Full Time We're looking for our first frontend engineer and product designer to help build a brand new open source product that helps users of all skill levels use, extend, and visualize their data. We are heavily inspired by Dabble DB ( ▶ this video ). The current team is two engineers, we're alumni of Creative Commons and have experience working on open source projects and building community. We're aiming for an initial team size of four. We're based out of the nonprofit Center of Complex Interventions and are advised by Joi Ito and Reid Hoffman. Full job descriptions and application instructions: Frontend Engineer: link Product Designer: link Feel free to email me at kriti<at>centerofci<dot>org if you have any questions. Mention that you saw the HN post.
I've thought a bit about this, churning around various product ideas. In general I'd say that if it's a typical SaaS, I would probably only trust it with my data, my time (learning curve, adapting workflow etc) if it was a available under a licence that would allow me to self-host it if it was discontinued (or pay someone else to host it for me). This is for stuff like mail, images and other DAM (Digital Asset Management) systems, chat/im, bug trackers/knowledgestores and databases etc. Note, that I don't see any reason to trust Google either. Remember wave? Remember XMPP compatible gtalk? My conclusion has been that if/when I finally get started on my first product, I'll probably license it under AGPL, and make sure there's a realistic self-host story for users -- and then charge for the SaaS/PaaS-bit, but probably not for the client (or server side software under AGPL). Clearly it's a little more challenging -- you might end up with people competing with you for hosting -- but I can't see any other way to build customer trust. Nothing any company would say to me as a customer would make me trust them -- how could I ask anything else from my potential users? Since people still pay for hosted email (even if many, many do run off to freemium services) -- I'd say the business model is viable -- those that can afford to pay, and know that value can be added by proper hosting -- and not having to do everything themselves -- will consider becoming a customer. And I strongly suspec