Rolling a Reliant Robin | Top Gear | BBC

Jeremy Clarkson of BBC Top Gear had a lot of fun with a Reliant Robin. This is one of the single funnies videos I've ever watched. It never gets old. Clearly, a 3 wheeled vehicle needs 2 wheels in front, not the other way around. ▶ this video I think there's an even longer version around, but this one makes the point!

I mean sure, we've seen the capabilities of the Reliant Robin as a tiny 3-wheeled car, so electrifying such a vehicle only makes sense. First, the incredible handling on cobblestone and narrow streets in the UK: ▶ this video Then later, scientists were actually able to launch one into outer space as a viable alternative to the space shuttle: link

Wait. Where have I seen some threewheeler like the PEBL before? Right ▶ this video ;-). Well, in reality it is not as bad, according to link

> three or four wheels are perfect Presumably, not like the three-wheeled Robin Reliant car that launched in the UK in the 1970s :-) ▶ this video

They are, the car is pushing "forward and to the outside" of turns. For some chuckles, here's Top Gear demonstrating the fact (over and over) ▶ this video As a sibling comment mentions, the two-front, one-back configuration is out there in sport-leisure type vehicles. I think it appeals to people who want motorcycle-ish sportiness but maybe are turned off by the appearance of complete exposure or the possibility of dropping the bike. Modern three-wheelers I'm aware of, on roughly the "car-ish <----> bike-ish" spectrum are the Campagna T-REX, the Polaris Slingshot, Can-Am Spyder, Piaggio MP3, and the Yamaha Niken. The first two are pretty "sporty car" vehicles, the latter two "complicated motorbikes", and the Spyder maybe a 40-60 mix, IMO.

It certainly looks much better (and safer) than another 3-wheeled car that was also a health hazard: the reliant robin [1]. Where is Top Gear when you need them.[2] If they manage to reach that sub-$7,000 price range, that would make the Elio a very affordable option for commuters. However, the reduced room means that unless you are single and travel light, you would probably need another car for everything else. An electric version of this would be awesome. [1]: link [2]: ▶ this video

Reminds me of the Robin Reliant, here's a video by a popular overseas motoring show that gives you a glimpse of the problems incurred when a high center of gravity is met with 3 wheels. ▶ this video

I looked up the point you are making. The data backs you up, 3 wheelers suffer from inherent instability on turns. ▶ this video "When the single wheel is in the front , the vehicle is inherently unstable in a braking turn, as the combined tipping forces at the center of gravity from turning and braking can rapidly extend beyond the triangle formed by the contact patches of the wheels. This type, if not tipped, also has a greater tendency to spin out ("swap ends") when handled roughly." What a pity. I was quite excited about the prospects.

It's good that other car manufacturers did not throw in the towel when they saw how successful Ford was. Sadly, they mostly copied the cars and production techniques. Although some have dared to innovate: ▶ this video What is amazing is that an open source project comes anywhere close to keeping up with what is one of the flagship products of one of the largest, most profitable companies the world has ever known.

Top Gear is an entertainment show with cars as the backdrop. Just like Daily show is a comedy show with political clips. If you want a car review show, take a look at Motor Week. I think these claims of "faking" are ridiculous when you have episodes where cast members "die" (top gear apocalypse), and characteristics are emphasized for comedic effect ( ▶ this video ). This article claims because of Top Gear's antics, the public is being misinformed about the benefits of electric cars. It completely misses the point that 1. it is not a car review show, and 2. there is a major poetical component of the show that celebrates automotive history. They like exciting cars and bash boring uninspired ones (except if its remarkably boring). Their reviews emphasize a car's essence, not necessarily a list of facts. I think this view is coming from a place that has a vested interest in electric cars, and not anyone who really watches the show. Otherwise they'd be attacking all the claims ("Some Say") made about The Stig.