Why CG Sucks (Except It Doesn't)
RocketJump Film School3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2017–2023
commentary · general · evergreen · 2017–2023 on HN
RocketJump Film School argues that we only notice bad CG while great CG is invisible, so CG seems to be everywhere ruining movies when it often is not.
Used as a counterpoint whenever commenters claim CGI always looks fake.
Up next
3 mo on HNJonathan Haidt: The moral roots of liberals and conservatives
TED
3 HN recommender · 2016–2018
5 mo on HNClickbait is Unreasonably Effective
Veritasium
5 HN recommender · 2021–2025
2 mo on HNThe Unreasonable Efficiency of Black Holes
minutephysics
2 HN recommender · 2020–2025
3 mo on HNHow Electricity Actually Works
Veritasium
4 HN recommender · 2023–2026
5 mo on HNGovernment Surveillance: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
5 HN recommender · 2015–2023
3 mo on HNHow Not to Land an Orbital Rocket Booster
SpaceX
4 HN recommender · 2018–2026
3 mo on HNSpherical Geometry Is Stranger Than Hyperbolic - Hyperbolica Devlog #2
CodeParade
3 HN recommender · 2021–2026
6 mo on HNThe Biggest Misconception About Electricity
Veritasium
7 HN recommender · 2021–2026
13 mo on HNThe Beauty of Bézier Curves
Freya Holmér
16 HN recommender · 2021–2026
10 mo on HNEd Catmull, Pixar: Keep Your Crises Small
Stanford Graduate School of Business
9 HN recommender · 2010–2017
8 mo on HN"Money doesn't interest me" - Ton Roosendaal 2017 Interview
Blender Guru
7 HN recommender · 2018–2025
8 mo on HNDNA animation (2002-2014) by Drew Berry and Etsuko Uno wehi.tv #ScienceArt
WEHImovies
9 HN recommender · 2020–2026
7 comments from Hacker News
This video from a few years ago is a great counterpoint: ▶ this video It's not defending all CGI, just arguing that we only notice it when it's bad. It's basically a toupée fallacy
Related video about why people think CGI sucks or is still in the uncanny valley: ▶ this video Basically we consider CGI bad because we only see bad CGI. If it's used properly and the director/creator understands its limitations we either don't notice it or use our suspension of disbelief and don't care.
Computer graphics are already better than a lot of people realize, because now you only "see" the bad effects. The good effects you often don't notice. Highly relevant YouTube video: ▶ this video While they may not quite be there yet, I think a lot of the modern animated movies are deliberately affecting a style, rather than being forced into one by the technology.
> A good SPA is indistinguishable from a native app. Exactly. It’s like CGI in movies. People always talk about how bad CGI is, without realizing just how much good CGI they never notice. ▶ this video
> CGI now somehow looks worse than VFX 10-30 years ago It's somewhat incorrect. We now have significantly more CGI, and most of it significantly better. See, e.g., Why C.G. Sucks (Except It Doesn't) ▶ this video However, the over-reliance on CGI is a problem
> even today, a discerning viewer can still tell CGI apart from live action You can tell BAD CGI apart from live action. ▶ this video
> He's saying that CGI, despite decades of progress, seem _fake_ in a way that subtly destroys our sense of immersion Because he choses to use bad CGI in comparisons and completely ignores all the cases where CGI is invisible. See Why CG Sucks (Except It Doesn't) ▶ this video "I think that CG looks bad is because we only see bad CG. Amazing, wonderfully executed CG is everywhere, we just don't know it"