Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2021–2022
lecture · general · evergreen · 2021–2022 on HN
A lecture for high school seniors and college freshmen making the case for nuclear power and answering common objections. It is an overview of the channel's more detailed videos on each topic.
Pointed to as a lay-audience explanation of nuclear waste, safety and economics.
Up next
10 mo on HNWhy This Channel Exists (and why I hate Houston)
Not Just Bikes
11 HN recommender · 2021–2025
8 mo on HNThe Secret War
Sergio IQ
4 HN recommender · 2019–2025
13 mo on HND/A and A/D | Digital Show and Tell (Monty Montgomery @ xiph.org)
FL Studio
15 HN recommender · 2017–2026
13 mo on HNMIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
16 HN recommender · 2017–2023
10 mo on HNBreakthrough in Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte
MIT Club of Northern California
11 HN recommender · 2016–2024
7 mo on HNHow close is nuclear fusion power?
Sabine Hossenfelder
15 HN recommender · 2021–2022
5 mo on HNEnergy Investments Dialogue | Bill Gates | Global Energy Forum
Stanford ENERGY
3 HN recommender · 2019–2020
4 mo on HNWho Destroyed Three Mile Island? - Nickolas Means | The Lead Developer Austin 2018
LeadDev
4 HN recommender · 2020–2024
4 mo on HNWorst Nuclear Accidents in History
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
7 HN recommender · 2021–2023
4 mo on HNEconomics of Nuclear Reactor
Illinois EnergyProf
4 HN recommender · 2020–2025
5 mo on HNWhy I changed my mind about nuclear power | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxBerlin
TEDx Talks
6 HN recommender · 2018–2021
4 mo on HNThorium: An energy solution - THORIUM REMIX 2011
gordonmcdowell
4 HN recommender · 2011–2022
3 comments from Hacker News
Not only is it solvable, it's basically been solved for years. ▶ this video is aimed at the lay audience. The issue is that radiation is a silent killer, so it is extremely easy people with vested interests in (say) fossil fuels to exploit our inability to access risk. Coal hurts people every single day, but it doesn't have the same poetic weight as radiation so this is lost on the general public. Nuclear power is expensive, however. Dealing with the waste is also an issue but firstly, forcing us to deal with the waste seriously is potentially not such a bad thing (assuming we need nuclear in the long run, which unless storage comes a very long way we presumably will), and secondly this is the kind of question where a government with a lot of political capital needs to just find some deserted land to build a long term solution.
On that note for anyone interested in the economics(and working in general) of nuclear energy check out the Illinois Energy youtube channel. Here's a quiz video of theirs: ▶ this video
This video (llinois EnergyProf) covers the accident scenarios for nuclear power ▶ this video Short answer, the design is such that reactor shuts down automatically with loss of cooling.