HackerTube

Clerks - Death Star Contractors

AbsCited 8× on HN, 2013–2025
YouTube
comedy · general · evergreen · 2013–2025 on HN

A short scene from the film Clerks in which two characters debate whether the independent contractors killed on the second Death Star were innocent victims. It is a comedic discussion of moral responsibility.

Invoked as a joke or analogy whenever contractors or employees work for a morally dubious or doomed organization.

8 comments from Hacker News

@toyg2025-06 · in “Cinematography of “Andor””

This is the sort of reference I winked at - or any of the other derivatives of the infamous Clerks dialogue: ▶ this video

@ethbr02023-03 · in “UBS Agrees to Buy Credit Suisse in Historic Deal to End Crisis”

Because there's a part of HN too young to appreciate your comment, it's a reference to a debate in Clerks about independent contractors working on the Death Star II: ▶ this video

@function_seven2022-03 · in “$625M worth of ETH drained on Axie Infinity's Ronin Network”

This is like the contractors working on the Death Star when it was blown up.[1] They knew what they were working on. They knew the dangers. Can't cry for them when they're blown to smithereens. I've been asked on two separate occasions to work on some crypto startup idea. Aside from my skepticism that they were even worthwhile projects, I declined because hell no I'm not writing code that touches other people's money . [1] ▶ this video

@dehrmann2019-01 · in “Bed that saved me from the Taliban”

Reminds me of Clerks and the Death Star contractors, though this line of thinking has scary implications for working in the World Trade Center, any federal building, or Youtube. ▶ this video

@mabbo2017-04 · in “Uber said to use “sophisticated” software to defraud drivers, passengers”

Both driver and passenger think they know the full truth of the matter for the financial transaction they're agreeing to, but they don't. There's implicit dishonesty in that, and when you combine dishonesty with money we call it 'fraud' usually. But let's set aside the question of whether it was legal. Was it moral? Software like this doesn't fall from the sky- management approved it, software teams wrote it, maintain it and system tests probably exist to validate it works... how do those developers feel okay about this? How do they not feel like they're cheating people out of money? When your Mom hears about it, and asks if you were part of it will you spend 20 minutes giving a long-winded answer about how it was actually not a bad thing? That's a bad sign, man. I'm reminded of the scene from 'Clerks' discussing Contractors[0] [0] ▶ this video