HackerTube

Self-Parking cars Tesla v Audi v Ford v BMW - test and comparison - are they any good?

RSymons “RSEV” Cited 20× on HN, 2022–2024
YouTube
demo · general · 2022–2024 on HN

A hands-on comparison of self-parking systems on a Tesla Model S and 3 (including AP1 vs AP2), an Audi e-tron GT, a Ford Mustang Mach-E and a BMW i4 M50. It tests both parallel and perpendicular parking and finds Tesla's newer vision-based parking noticeably…

Cited repeatedly in Tesla threads as concrete side-by-side evidence that Tesla's self-parking lags other manufacturers, undercutting its full self-driving claims.

12 comments from Hacker News

@akmarinov2024-01 · in “On a Tesla: Don't”

Tesla focused on FSD almost exclusively and everything in the car's software suffered because of that and stupid decisions to remove hardware. Autopilot is on a separate branch from FSD, not getting significant updates with the promise that at some point, it'll be merged with the FSD branch and it'll be super awesome - this year for sure, but maybe next year or 10 years after, look we made a robot that's definitely not a guy in a suit and it'll be out in 5 years, maybe 10, it can water plants now!, look a Cybertruck! isn't steel cool, etc When they switched from Mobileye to their own stack, it noticeably regressed in performance, then they worked to get it to work decently, but dropped the radar during Covid, going all in on Vision, regressing it even further. They promised at that time to at some point match the original Autopilot by reintroducing a distance of 1 and a max speed higher than 140 km/h and it's been 2 years since then with nothing on the front. Summon/ Smart summon as the guy in the article points out - is great, but doesn't work without USS sensors, which they removed and the functionality is coming back some day, but likely not soon, because it's not a priority. They've been selling cars for more than a year now that don't have that functionality, even though it's in a package worth 4000 euros that gets you basically nothing. Autopark - same thing, just look at these videos as a comparison - ▶ this video link It's easily the worst out of all manufacturers. In th

Critical View on HN
@zuhsetaqi2023-07 · in “With the 745-Mile Solid-State Battery, Toyota Just Became a Force to Reckon With”

> Yet to see other auto manufacturers come anywhere near Tesla’s driver assistance system. ▶ this video There is nothing more to say about the 'glorious Tesla driver assistance system'. It can't even do basic tasks with super slow speed, no moving objects and all time in the world.

Critical View on HN
@Hamuko2023-04 · in “Tesla removes parking sensors, the results are predictably terrible”

Pretty sure they use ultrasonic sensors. This channel actually had an automated parking test with many different EVs, and Tesla's performance was pretty all over the place there too. ▶ this video

Critical View on HN
@clouddrover2023-03 · in “Pentagon Looking to Make Sure SpaceX Doesn’t Abandon Them in War”

> He's never been in it for the money. Ah, so he must be in it for the bullshit and the lies. Like with his supposed full self-driving. Falsely claiming FSD "next year", year after year: link In reality Teslas can't even park themselves: ▶ this video Falsely claiming all Teslas have the hardware for FSD in 2016: link In reality the older Teslas now won't get Hardware 4: link That's some real good good faith.

Critical View on HN
@inferiorhuman2023-02 · in “Apple signs union agreement for Glasgow Apple Store staff”

You spent your whole comment focusing on their self driving claims while ignoring the rest of the company. The rest of the company? You mean the senior management that lord elno raided in an attempt to prop up Twitter? The VW ID4 has numerous complaints about their software and reliability. ▶ this video link link That's some impressive software.