Carbon Offsets! Can't we just buy our way out of climate change?
Climate Town2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2022–2023
commentary · general · evergreen · 2022–2023 on HN
Climate Town's comedic explainer on carbon offsets and whether companies can buy their way out of climate change. It argues that offsets won't save us, while granting they are not bad in principle.
HN shares it as an entertaining, well-argued critique of carbon offsetting in threads on greenwashing.
Up next
5 mo on HNThe Carbon Offset Problem
Wendover Productions
5 HN recommender · 2022–2023
4 mo on HNMouse Cursor History (and why I made my own)
Posy
4 HN recommender · 2022–2026
8 mo on HNVáclav Smil at Driva Climate Investment Meeting 2019
Nysnø Klimainvesteringer
3 HN recommender · 2019–2024
9 mo on HNHow to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change | Allan Savory
TED
9 HN recommender · 2013–2023
8 mo on HNCan YOU Fix Climate Change?
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
10 HN recommender · 2021–2026
8 mo on HNLife in Syntropy
Agenda Gotsch
4 HN recommender · 2017–2023
8 mo on HNEating less Meat won't save the Planet. Here's Why
Joseph Everett - WIL
10 HN recommender · 2021–2026
7 mo on HNMichael Moore Presents: Planet of the Humans | A Film by Jeff Gibbs | Full Documentary
Michael Moore
7 HN recommender · 2020–2024
7 mo on HNIt’s Time To Break Up With Our Gas Stoves | Climate Town
Climate Town
10 HN recommender · 2021–2025
7 mo on HNGwynne Dyer -- Geopolitics in a Hotter World
The University of British Columbia
4 HN recommender · 2018–2023
6 mo on HNThe Great Global Warming Swindle Full Movie
Kazza0423
2 HN recommender · 2015–2020
5 mo on HNA CONSERVATIVE solution to global warming (Part 1)
potholer54
3 HN recommender · 2019–2022
4 comments from Hacker News
Carbon footprints are a scam: link Carbon offsets are a scam: ▶ this video Hearing people talk about these give me the same vibes as techbros talking about stocks and crypto.
> Carbon offsetting is needlessly and cynically attacked by the same people who talk about wind power killing birds or not recycling the blades. well i don't really understand how you can lump all those together but ok... they're still not the same. as others have pointed out, it doesn't seem hard (or hard enough) to scam in this business sector - i.e. having the same assets accounting for different offset purchases, or just conflating assets bought for different puroses with offsetting. furthermore, it just deviates us from what should be the true goal: reduce fossil fuel consumption. not to mention how big business just offload this shady business cost to the end consumer. i'm taking the chance to share some content by people that present their points of view on this issue much better than i do: link , link , link , ▶ this video
While I'm not saying this whitepaper is wrong, keep in mind that this is done by Carbon Engineering who receive funding from people and organizations like N. Murray Edwards[1], Chevron Corporation, Occidental Petroleum and BHP[2] which either have hands deep in the oil or mining market, among other things. There is financial incentive to provide results that are in-line with what your funders want, and it's nothing new that this kind of thing has been, and still is being done. It's just hard to prove often. So as with all science, consult multiple whitepapers, including ones that don't have direct or borderline not indirect funding from those who have financial incentive to get a result that increases revenue or similar, to get a clearer idea of the probability that the topic isn't incorrect or what have you. As an aside, whether it's right or wrong (since it's a heated topic), I feel these videos demonstrate at least the possibility of companies playing with these kinds of things. They're amusing to watch, if nothing else, in my opinion: link and ▶ this video [1] link [2] link
See also: ▶ this video ("Carbon Offsets! Can't we just buy our way out of climate change?" from the Climate Town channel)