Climate Change Debate: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2015–2023
comedy · general · evergreen · 2015–2023 on HN
A short Last Week Tonight segment where John Oliver stages a statistically representative climate debate, with Bill Nye facing a crowd of dissenters. It satirizes false balance in media coverage.
Cited to illustrate false balance and the trouble with giving all sides equal weight.
Up next
3 mo on HNintroducing copyparty, the FOSS file server
tripflag
7 HN recommender · 2025–2026
5 mo on HNStar Size Comparison 2
morn1415
5 HN recommender · 2016–2022
3 mo on HNTim Minchin's Storm the Animated Movie
stormmovie
3 HN recommender · 2013–2026
3 mo on HNThe Daily Show - Burn Noticed
Comedy Central
2 HN recommender · 2015–2025
15 mo on HNIn Search Of A Flat Earth
Folding Ideas
17 HN recommender · 2020–2026
13 mo on HNThe Century of the Self (Full Adam Curtis Documentary)
David Lessig
13 HN recommender · 2016–2026
11 mo on HNThe Loving Trap
Ben Woodhams
15 HN recommender · 2012–2026
9 mo on HNThe Century of the Self - Part 1: "Happiness Machines"
JustAdamCurtis
13 HN recommender · 2017–2025
8 mo on HNThis Is What Winning Looks Like (Full Length)
VICE
7 HN recommender · 2014–2023
8 mo on HNThe Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire | The Secret World of Finance
Independent POV
6 HN recommender · 2019–2024
8 mo on HNContrepreneurs: The Mikkelsen Twins
Folding Ideas
10 HN recommender · 2022–2026
8 mo on HNMay 1, 1969: Fred Rogers testifies before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications
Road Less Marveled
9 HN recommender · 2015–2026
5 comments from Hacker News
There is a nice visual example of this made by John Oliver on his show to illustrate this to a more understandable level: ▶ this video
Exactly, and demonstrated beautifully by John Oliver: ▶ this video An aim at 'balance' is part of the problem because it's not an aim at facts or truth. Aiming at balance is the media twisting debate to produce maximum outrage, and therefore increase 'consumer engagement'. Aiming at balance is politicians providing themselves supposed reasons to maintain the status quo or move in counter-factual directions.
Watch Fox new much? Climate deniers love this argument. Jon Stewart answers your question here: link While looking for the clip I found this gem: ▶ this video
> This website should neither compete with nor replace regular journalism. That’s good in theory, but people will use it like that anyway. We’re living in an era of rampant misinformation. Provable truths we’ve know for thousands of years are being called into question (the shape of the Earth). Even people who should know to do their own research (see recent case of lawyers using ChatGPT) are taking AI output as unquestionable truth. Your website won’t eliminate bias, it will only give people more sources to cherry pick. > Hence, I try to highlight different view points along with contrasting opinions Which exacerbates the issue. If we can prove the Earth is a sphere and 99% of people understand that, making it seem like the “contrasting opinion” is equally valid and deserves the same weighted consideration makes the problem worse, not better. John Oliver illustrated the problem in 2014, using climate change as the example. ▶ this video
There aren't only "two sides", as much as American conditioning may have you believe. And if you want true representativity, you get problems like this: ▶ this video