Choice, happiness and spaghetti sauce | Malcolm Gladwell
TEDCited 5× on HN, 2009–2026
talk · general · evergreen · 2009–2026 on HN
Malcolm Gladwell's TED talk on how Howard Moskowitz found that there is no single perfect spaghetti sauce. He draws a larger point about choice, preference and happiness.
Cited to argue that people do not know what they want and that markets should be segmented.
Up next
11 mo on HNDesigning the Ideal Bootstrapped Business with Jason Cohen
Rob Walling
13 HN recommender · 2020–2024
9 mo on HNThe Problem With Facebook
2veritasium
3 HN recommender · 2014–2018
9 mo on HNThis Video Is Sponsored By ███ VPN
Tom Scott
9 HN recommender · 2019–2026
8 mo on HNContrepreneurs: The Mikkelsen Twins
Folding Ideas
10 HN recommender · 2022–2026
8 mo on HNVidMe or Why Platforms Aren't Your Friends
Folding Ideas
8 HN recommender · 2017–2023
6 mo on HNJoe Ades , Greatest Salesman in New York City History !!! #KONYH !!
KING OF NEW YORK HACKS
6 HN recommender · 2009–2014
7 mo on HNMillennials Don't Exist! Adam Conover at Deep Shift
Adam Conover
5 HN recommender · 2016–2023
7 mo on HNStart with why -- how great leaders inspire action | Simon Sinek | TEDxPugetSound
TEDx Talks
6 HN recommender · 2015–2024
5 mo on HNHow Great Leaders Inspire Action | Simon Sinek | TED
TED
4 HN recommender · 2011–2022
5 mo on HNClickbait is Unreasonably Effective
Veritasium
5 HN recommender · 2021–2025
5 mo on HNFacebook Fraud
Veritasium
7 HN recommender · 2014–2025
4 mo on HNDropBox Demo
theragax
4 HN recommender · 2012–2024
5 comments from Hacker News
I like postgres. I use it for lots of projects. I like other databases too. I think thats okay. Here's Malcom Gladwell discussing spagetti sauce which feels oddly relevant: ▶ this video
> different people respond to different approaches Covered well by Malcolm Gladwell's spaghetti story. ▶ this video
Target a well-defined sub-market that Slack currently serves and serve it better by targeting it more precisely [1]. As demonstrated by the comments on this thread, there are a lot of people that all think that Slack needs to go in different directions , which agrees with my own personal observations of Slack's utility to different people on different teams. Slack is a simple, general solution that works well enough for a lot of teams and a lot of people. If you want to disrupt it, I doubt you're going to be able to improve it across the board point-for-point, so in stead you want to target a subgroup that's sort of well serviced by Slack but could stand to have tweaking done to fit it to their needs better. To collect some examples from this thread: * Some engineering teams need default UI that encourages larger message sizes so people aren't writing strings of tiny messages all the time. This _clearly_ isn't something that everybody wants or needs - a lot of brainstorming goes on in my Slack chats, for example, and that means tiny ideas have to go out quickly and easily - but it's a reasonable submarket to target. This would also lead to a larger emphasis on text formatting and composition, better controls on notification and addressing, better searching and filtering and quoting/reply/threading, and other tools that improve the power of an individual message at the expense of usability and speed - move it more toward the email/forum topic side of things. * Some teams feel
People have no idea what they want or need, or even what they like. Observe the following empirical evidence as presented by respected marketer Malcolm Gladwell: ▶ this video Also, that bit about a heart valve is a sly reference to a famous polymath-type who invented a revolutionary kind of heart valve as just one part of a long and incredibly varied career. Can anyone remember who this is? Google is giving me nothing.
Depending on your market size/slice it's possible in a good sized company to have folks that are so well entwined in that community that they can help give feedback about their favorite products. Part of the problem with marketing is that people don't know what they want. ▶ this video