Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile
Numberphile2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020–2025
explainer · general · evergreen · 2020–2025 on HN
Matt Parker on Numberphile explains the strange properties of spheres in higher dimensions, such as how they poke out of their bounding boxes. It uses Pythagoras to build intuition for 4D and beyond.
Recommended whenever the counterintuitive geometry of high-dimensional spheres comes up, including in vector embedding discussions.
Up next
3 mo on HNWhy Starting A Rocket Engine Is So Hard!
Everyday Astronaut
3 HN recommender · 2023–2026
3 mo on HNA4 / V2 Rocket in detail: Turbopump
Astronomy and Nature TV
3 HN recommender · 2019–2022
3 mo on HNWhy guitarists USED TO play more in tune! (Microtonal Frets)
Brandon Acker
3 HN recommender · 2022–2026
2 mo on HNSuperluminal Time Travel + Time Warp Challenge Answer
PBS Space Time
2 HN recommender · 2018–2022
2 mo on HNDelvon Lamarr Organ Trio - Warm-up Set (Live on KEXP)
KEXP
2 HN recommender · 2020–2025
13 mo on HNMIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
16 HN recommender · 2017–2023
7 mo on HNmRNA Translation (Advanced)
DNA Learning Center
4 HN recommender · 2014–2025
9 mo on HNOrigins of Precision
Machine Thinking
11 HN recommender · 2019–2025
18 mo on HNVectors | Chapter 1, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
17 HN recommender · 2018–2026
15 mo on HNBut what is the Fourier Transform? A visual introduction.
3Blue1Brown
16 HN recommender · 2018–2025
14 mo on HNBut what is a neural network? | Deep learning chapter 1
3Blue1Brown
16 HN recommender · 2017–2025
13 mo on HNThe Beauty of Bézier Curves
Freya Holmér
16 HN recommender · 2021–2026
4 comments from Hacker News
There is a good numberphile video about that ▶ this video It contains also a hilarious reference to the "parker circle:.
Generalizations to higher dimensions[1] also have some fun properties. For one, the volume of a n-dimensional sphere (ball) goes to zero as n goes to infinity. But not in a trivial way: given a radius r, you can find the number of dimensions n that maximizes the volume of the n-sphere. For r=1 it's 5 dimensions, but for r=3 it's 55 dimensions. Numberphile[2] has a video on higher dimensional spheres which talks about this weirdness. [1]: link [2]: ▶ this video
Also not a topologist, but thought it was interesting after watching the video from the current top comment, ▶ this video , where if you look at the size of the "contained sphere", 4D is the only place where the contained sphere is exactly tangent to the containing box. Lower than that, and it's easy to visualize how the contained sphere is smaller, higher than that, the contained sphere is always bigger. So seems like it might be a natural consequence that techniques that work at higher or lower dimensions don't work for the case in 4D where the sphere is exactly tangent.
Oh they are very spike-y, well, my point in the above post is to just solve the eq but easier 'visualization' would be [0] By the way, this is a similar phenomena to the 'curse of dimensionality' [1] [0] ▶ this video [1] link