What is the Ultraviolet Catastrophe?
Physics Explained2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2022–2025
lecture · intermediate · evergreen · 2022–2025 on HN
A detailed 40-minute explanation of the ultraviolet catastrophe, covering Rayleigh and Jeans' classical treatment of blackbody radiation and Planck's quantum hypothesis. It follows the Eisberg and Resnick textbook treatment.
Recommended for a math-heavy but thorough treatment of the ultraviolet catastrophe and the history of the experiments.
Up next
16 mo on HNHow Python was Shaped by leaky Internals, Armin Ronacher, Flask framework
Видео с мероприятий {speach!
15 HN recommender · 2017–2025
8 mo on HNGuarding Against Physical Attacks: The Xbox One Story — Tony Chen, Microsoft
Platform Security Summit
8 HN recommender · 2019–2026
6 mo on HNA new way to visualize General Relativity
ScienceClic English
8 HN recommender · 2020–2026
8 mo on HNI bought 1000 meters of wire to settle a physics debate
AlphaPhoenix
8 HN recommender · 2021–2026
15 mo on HNThe Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know
Google TechTalks
11 HN recommender · 2012–2025
9 mo on HNQuantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance
Veritasium
9 HN recommender · 2015–2022
6 mo on HNQuantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong
The Royal Institution
5 HN recommender · 2019–2025
6 mo on HNThe Physics and Philosophy of Time - with Carlo Rovelli
The Royal Institution
5 HN recommender · 2018–2022
5 mo on HNThe Biggest Ideas in the Universe: Introduction
Sean Carroll
5 HN recommender · 2021–2025
5 mo on HNDemystifying the Higgs Boson with Leonard Susskind
Stanford
3 HN recommender · 2016–2024
6 mo on HNThe more general uncertainty principle, regarding Fourier transforms
3Blue1Brown
7 HN recommender · 2019–2025
5 mo on HNVisualization of Quantum Physics (Quantum Mechanics)
udiprod
3 HN recommender · 2017–2021
4 comments from Hacker News
Kinda funny. Just before seeing this article I had just finished watching a wonderful video on the "Ultraviolet Catastrophe" ( ▶ this video ) which isn't exactly the same as what's being talked about here... but in the same class of problem if you make that class big enough :-). When looking at these sorts of things, surely such "hockey sticks" are often times just not considering the limiting factors? I'm no mathematician (by any approximation) but it seems like more often than not finding such a result should point to some incompleteness or some closer look being required to get the full picture. (P.S. that video was very math heavy and no, I didn't understand most of the math beyond hand-wavy terms... still glad they went into the detail.)
Science Asylum is great, but I dislike the 90s educational show presentation format. An absolute gem I've stumbled across is ScienceClic: link They have amazing presentations on Relativity, my favorite being: "A new way to visualize General Relativity" - link "Hawking Radiation" - link Another, while heavier and less accessible channel is Physics Explained: link These are closer like lectures, but I enjoy them because they go into the histories of some of these experiments; and what the prevailing wisdom was around the time the experiments were performed: "What is the Ultraviolet Catastrophe?" - ▶ this video
You know about the Ultraviolet catastrophe? Physics Explained Ultraviolet Catastrophe: ▶ this video This Veritassium Video goes back further in time and talks about Action, and the Genesis of this idea. link Chemistorian, The history of Atomic Theory. link
This is the basis of the "ultraviolet catastrophe" and lead to the discovery of quantization of radiation. The "catastrophe" being that as classical laws for light implied a potentially unbounded amount of energy as wavelength decreased. link ▶ this video