14nm and 7nm are NOT what you think it is - Visiting Tescan Part 3/3
der8auer1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2020–2021
demo · intermediate · 2020–2021 on HN
Der8auer visits Tescan and uses an electron microscope to compare real transistor sizes on Intel 14nm and AMD 7nm chips. It shows that process node names do not match physical measurements.
HN cites it as visual evidence that nm node names are marketing labels and for its neat electron microscope comparison.
Up next
18 mo on HNIndistinguishable From Magic: Manufacturing Modern Computer Chips
Andor Gafotas
19 HN recommender · 2016–2024
8 mo on HNThe Extreme Engineering of ASML’s EUV Light Source
Asianometry
11 HN recommender · 2022–2025
8 mo on HNJim Keller: Moore's Law, Microprocessors, and First Principles | Lex Fridman Podcast #70
Lex Fridman
8 HN recommender · 2020–2023
8 mo on HNJim Keller: Moore’s Law is Not Dead
UC Berkeley EECS
7 HN recommender · 2019–2025
7 mo on HNWhy It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LED
Veritasium
10 HN recommender · 2024–2026
5 mo on HN38C3 - From Silicon to Sovereignty: How Advanced Chips are Redefining Global Dominance
media.ccc.de
5 HN recommender · 2025–2026
5 mo on HNThe man who almost faked his way to a Nobel Prize
BobbyBroccoli
6 HN recommender · 2022–2023
5 mo on HNAWS re:Invent 2016: Tuesday Night Live with James Hamilton
Amazon Web Services
5 HN recommender · 2016–2023
4 mo on HNHow does Computer Memory Work? 💻🛠
Branch Education
5 HN recommender · 2022–2023
4 mo on HN"Z2" - Upgraded Homemade Silicon Chips
Sam Zeloof
4 HN recommender · 2021–2026
4 mo on HNThe Extreme Physics Pushing Moore’s Law to the Next Level
Seeker
5 HN recommender · 2019–2023
4 mo on HNBuilding a 6800 CPU on an FPGA with nMigen (part 1)
Robert Baruch
3 HN recommender · 2020–2021
4 comments from Hacker News
Like others have said, the numbers aren't comparable between manufacturers. Here's a neat video where they use an electron microscope to actually compare the transistor sizes for Intel 14nm and AMD 7nm: ▶ this video
This reminds me of seeing a part of the chip from a scanning electron microscope: ▶ this video But I wonder how successful these methods are are extracting keys from a TPM or other hardware keys.
According to this video using an electron scanning microscope on amd and Intel chips, the “7nm” or “10nm” number does not measure anything, and is effectively a process version number for marketing. From memory there is no single number for measuring transistors or efficiency, transistor density is useful, but it doesn’t tell you the performance or power usage. ▶ this video
der8auer "14nm and 7nm are NOT what you think it is - Visiting Tescan" ▶ this video for reference "TESCAN is a leading global producer and supplier of scanning electron microscopes, focused ion beam scanning electron microscopes and micro-CT solutions."