How to achieve nanometer precision in space?
Breaking Taps4 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2022–2026
explainer · intermediate · evergreen · 2022–2026 on HN
Breaking Taps explains how the cryogenic mirror actuators on the James Webb Space Telescope achieve nanometer precision using flexures. It shows a 3D-printed replica and how one motor handles both coarse and fine motion.
Commenters repeatedly recommend it in JWST threads as a great explanation of clever mechanical design that is accurate and long lasting.
Up next
2 mo on HNFiring the Lorentz Plasma Cannon
LightningOnDemand
2 HN recommender · 2025–2026
1 mo on HNCYMATICS: Science Vs. Music - Nigel Stanford
Nigel John Stanford
1 HN recommend · 2019–2023
3 mo on HNTWO Unpickable (?) Locks for Lock Picking Lawyer!
Stuff Made Here
3 HN recommender · 2021–2022
4 mo on HNThis is why we can't have nice things
Veritasium
4 HN recommender · 2021–2024
7 mo on HNThe Future of Mathematics?
Microsoft Research
9 HN recommender · 2019–2025
3 mo on HNFast Inverse Square Root — A Quake III Algorithm
Nemean
3 HN recommender · 2021–2022
3 mo on HN[1299] Unpickable Locks From Stuff Made Here
LockPickingLawyer
5 HN recommender · 2021–2022
5 mo on HNWhy can't you multiply vectors?
Freya Holmér
9 HN recommender · 2023–2025
15 mo on HNAround The Corner - How Differential Steering Works (1937)
US Auto Industry
17 HN recommender · 2013–2024
12 mo on HNDetergent packs are kinda wishy-washy (Dishwashers Explained)
Technology Connections
15 HN recommender · 2021–2025
12 mo on HNMechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers
Excelsior10000
13 HN recommender · 2014–2025
11 mo on HNThe Antique Toaster that's Better than Yours
Technology Connections
12 HN recommender · 2019–2025
6 comments from Hacker News
The actuator is a genius flexure design that is both mechanically simple and accurate. Breaking Taps 3d-prints a working replica and describes the design. I highly recommend: ▶ this video The actuator breaking wasn't as concerning after seeing the design.
I have a related question, how far are you turning the thumbscrews when making adjustments? I think M3 standard thread pitch is 0.5mm, so to a first approximation that almost 1000 wavelengths (if I have the SI units right in my head, and I'm not 3 orders of magnitude out?). I suspect the left/right and up/down adjustments have as fairly high lever ratio, but I can't imagine you could successfully adjust the in/out distance with any precision (not in the 690nm sense anyway)? Is the in/out distance not important so long as the beams are aligned? Dunno if you've seen it, but there's a great youtube video explaining how the actuators to align the James Webb mirrors work: ▶ this video including a 3D printable version of them: link "This is a replica of JWST's mirror actuators. Six of these actuators are paired into a hexapod / stewart platform arrangement and used to control 6 degrees of freedom of each mirror segment (tip, tilt, roll, x, y, z translation)."
This video ▶ this video was posted here link about how the actuators work on the James Webb telescope. It's a great watch.
Here a nice video that explains the mechanism that aligns each mirror: ▶ this video It is amazing that this is done with only a single motor. It works something like this: one direction of the motor sets which axis to align, the other direction sets the alignment of the chosen axis.
This video ▶ this video was posted here link about how the actuators work on the James Webb telescope. It's a great watch and shows how well thought out design can produce accurate and long lasting parts.
Clever. I wonder how the mechanical realization looks like, as I can't really wrap my head around it. Reminds me of the JWST actuators which also "overload" a single axis for coarse/fine control: ▶ this video