HackerTube

High speed camera reveals why sodium explodes!

Thunderf00t2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2015–2024
YouTube
explainer · general · evergreen · 2015–2024 on HN

Thunderf00t presents high-speed camera footage of alkali metals such as sodium and NaK reacting with water. The footage shows that the explosion is not caused by hydrogen ignition, as the usual explanation says. It is a Coulomb explosion driven by electrons l…

HN links it as the accessible video explanation of the sodium-in-water research, and when Coulomb explosions or sodium batteries come up.

10 comments from Hacker News

@gus_massa2023-10 · in “Sodium batteries offer an alternative to tricky lithium”

The article in Nature is about a paper by Thunderf00t (Phil Mason). He published the result in Nature Chemistry and also made a video ▶ this video (the video has a nice balance, it's technical but not too technical).

Recommends View on HN
@pdkl952015-09 · in “What if I were 1% charged? (2013)”

That's the video from before they published (which is still interesting). There is also a more recent video[1] (post-publication[2]) that covers how they got the data (which supports the coulombic explosion hypothesis). While it is mentioned at the end of the newer video, I highly recommend watching the 500fps footage[3] of a drop of NaK burning (just before it explodes) on the top of water. There is a striking color change as it starts to interact with the water, and right the NaK explodes... the metal turns completely transparent . [1] ▶ this video [2] link [3] link

Recommends View on HN
@gus_massa2024-07 · in “Harvester pulls 1.5 gallons of drinking water from arid air per day”

Don't dismiss the guy so easily. For example take a look at one of his papers link and the correspondong video ▶ this video

@gus_massa2024-07 · in “Coulomb explosion”

That was the comon explanation until Thuderf00t proved otherwise Video in YouTube: ▶ this video Paper in Nature Chemistry: link

@imtringued2022-08 · in “Can We Throw Satellites to Space? [video]”

Explain the wrong reasoning and flaws in these videos: link ▶ this video link link link I will take your words by face value and assume that none of these videos used or needed any amount of intellectual rigor and that he is not very smart. Okay, but if the bar is that high, then it appears that whatever scam kickstarter he debunks wasn't even on the scale of intellectual rigor or smartness.