Graham's Number - Numberphile
Numberphile4 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2013–2024
explainer · general · evergreen · 2013–2024 on HN
Numberphile's Tony Padilla and Matt Parker discuss Graham's number, once the largest number used in a mathematical proof, and how enormous it is.
Recommended as the mind-melting intro to unimaginably large numbers.
Up next
5 mo on HNHow Big is Graham's Number? (feat Ron Graham)
Numberphile
4 HN recommender · 2014–2024
2 mo on HNCppCon 2019: Matt Godbolt “Compiler Explorer: Behind The Scenes”
CppCon
2 HN recommender · 2021–2025
3 mo on HNTwitter and Visual Studio Rant
Molly Rocket
3 HN recommender · 2020–2026
5 mo on HNArithmetic, Population and Energy - a talk by Al Bartlett
lXlSalemlXl
6 HN recommender · 2016–2023
4 mo on HNCppCon 2016: Nicholas Ormrod “The strange details of std::string at Facebook"
CppCon
4 HN recommender · 2018–2026
2 mo on HNThe Forgotten Art of Structured Programming - Kevlin Henney [C++ on Sea 2019]
cpponsea
2 HN recommender · 2021–2022
9 mo on HNLISA11 - Fork Yeah! The Rise and Development of illumos
USENIX
9 HN recommender · 2012–2026
3 mo on HNHow big is a visible photon?
Huygens Optics
3 HN recommender · 2021–2025
18 mo on HNVectors | Chapter 1, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
17 HN recommender · 2018–2026
15 mo on HNBut what is the Fourier Transform? A visual introduction.
3Blue1Brown
16 HN recommender · 2018–2025
14 mo on HNBut what is a neural network? | Deep learning chapter 1
3Blue1Brown
16 HN recommender · 2017–2025
13 mo on HNThe Beauty of Bézier Curves
Freya Holmér
16 HN recommender · 2021–2026
6 comments from Hacker News
If math can make you feel awe, you've got to watch the Numberphile series on very big numbers. They're constants used in proofs that are specific, well-defined integers known to be finite, but so huge that the physical universe does not have enough particles (or even Plank-scale microstates) in it to represent the number of digits these numbers have! Absolutely mind-bending stuff. Listed in increasing order: "Graham's Number" ▶ this video "How Big is Graham's Number? (feat Ron Graham)" link "The Enormous TREE(3)" link "TREE(3) (extra footage)" link "The Daddy of Big Numbers (Rayo's Number)" link
My brain melts every time I watch this video [1] from Numberphile on Graham's number. They also had another video [2] with Ron Graham himself :) [1]: ▶ this video [2]: link
I've seen this notation in a video [1] on Graham's number [2] by Numberphile. It's a pretty interesting video for seeing how quickly the numbers get unimaginably massive. [1]: ▶ this video [2]: link
I love this video link by Sean Day[9] Plott describing Graham's number very well. At least I found that description very easy to follow. Numberphile [1] too has a great explanation, but I still strongly recommend watching Day[9] video because it tells a little bit of history and Sean is very expressive and good speaker so he easily engages viewer. [1] ▶ this video
10E65 if protons do decay. 10E(10E76) if protons do not decay and virtual black-holes do not exist. At about 10E(10E(10E56)) the universe should spontaneously create a new universe, so that that is the most upper limit of time in our universe. Fairly small actually, compared to things like Graham's number and Tree(3). Turns out, infinity is really big. link ▶ this video
Graham's number - for a while, the largest number used in a proof: ▶ this video There are faster growing sequences as well, see: link both fun as well. But busy beaver consumes them all.