Computers for Cynics 2 - It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC
TheTedNelson1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2014–2023
commentary · intermediate · evergreen · 2014–2023 on HN
Ted Nelson, in his Computers for Cynics series, gives a critical history of Xerox PARC's vision of personal computing. He lists what he sees as the limitations and wrong turns in PARC's approach to the desktop and documents.
HN readers treat it as a contrarian counterpoint to the usual PARC mythology, though one commenter noted a few apparent mistakes in it.
Up next
11 mo on HNBret Victor - Inventing on Principle
Rui Oliveira
12 HN recommender · 2013–2025
11 mo on HNBret Victor The Future of Programming
Joey Reid
12 HN recommender · 2017–2026
10 mo on HNA Tour of the Acme Editor
Russ Cox
11 HN recommender · 2012–2026
10 mo on HNAlan Kay's tribute to Ted Nelson at "Intertwingled" Festival
TheTedNelson
7 HN recommender · 2016–2025
8 mo on HNThe Mother of All Demos, presented by Douglas Engelbart (1968)
Marcel
8 HN recommender · 2013–2026
8 mo on HNAlan Kay: Doing with Images Makes Symbols (Full Version)
Kenneth Friedman
8 HN recommender · 2016–2023
6 mo on HNIn Search of Tomorrow
Berkeley Institute for Data Science (BIDS)
9 HN recommender · 2015–2018
6 mo on HNBret Victor - The Humane Representation of Thought
Colin McDonnell
4 HN recommender · 2017–2025
5 mo on HNEric Bier Demonstrates Cedar
Computer History Museum
3 HN recommender · 2020–2025
5 mo on HNIvan Sutherland Sketchpad Demo 1963
Interface Studies
5 HN recommender · 2016–2025
4 mo on HNMouse Cursor History (and why I made my own)
Posy
4 HN recommender · 2022–2026
5 mo on HNAlan Kay at OOPSLA 1997 - The computer revolution hasnt happened yet
Jeff Gonis
6 HN recommender · 2013–2025
3 comments from Hacker News
Thank you. Nelson does a great job enumerating the limitations of PARC's vision and the capabilities absent from PARC's work. After being exposed to PARC's self-congratulatory self-promotion for decades, Nelson's history is a breath of fresh air. This is not to devalue what PARC accomplished, but that its accomplishments must be taken in perspective. It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC is also on YouTube: ▶ this video
This comment jogged my memory of a Ted Nelson video subtitled 'It all went wrong at Xerox PARC' : ▶ this video
It's Ted Nelson rattling through some of his computer-history notes on camera. So it's good material, but it's much better presented in his enjoyable and reasonably-priced book /Geeks Bearing Gifts/ link . I noted a couple of apparent mistakes: at ▶ this video Nelson says that Xerox paid Jobs to look at the PARC work, while AFAIK Apple in fact paid Xerox, in pre-IPO Apple stock. He also suggested that Xerox tried to bring in Jobs, when it seems to have been Apple who made the approach (at the instigation of Jef Raskin at Apple). ▶ this video is misleading. PARC was more-or-less forbidden to buy a DEC PDP-10, which would have reflected badly on the competing machines from Xerox's new acquisition Scientific Data Systems, so PARC built a PDP-10 clone (the MAXC) in-house for their own use. That had very little to do with why they later designed and built the Altos: there was nothing remotely similar to an Alto out there that they could have bought (Nelson knows this).