HackerTube

Cheng Lou - On the Spectrum of Abstraction at react-europe 2016

ReactEurope5 HN recommenders · recommended in 5 months, 2016–2022
YouTube
talk · intermediate · evergreen · 2016–2022 on HN

Cheng Lou's react-europe 2016 talk lays out a mental framework for thinking about abstraction levels in JavaScript tooling, from Angular and Grunt to Webpack and React. It uses that framework to reason about the cost of abstractions and how to choose between…

HN points to it as thought-provoking material on the tradeoffs and costs of abstraction, especially in frontend tooling debates.

6 comments from Hacker News

@K0SM0S2017-03 · in “Next.js 2.0”

This talk is incredible food for thought: On the spectrum of abstraction by Cheng Lou (react-europe 2016) [1] If you've read some of the classics, such as Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs (1979, Gerald Jay Sussman and Hal Abelson) [2], this talk is a really interesting look at the state of affairs on abstraction circa 2016. [1]: ▶ this video [2]: link

Strongly recommends View on HN
@hnbad2022-10 · in “Moving from React to htmx”

I know, this isn't a novel concept. There was a good talk about the spectrum of abstractions and the tradeoffs of template languages vs React's approach at React Europe a couple of years ago (in fact, he goes into that this means there are some optimizations that are simply unavailable to React): ▶ this video The question isn't whether DSLs or "just JS" are more powerful, the question is which tradeoffs they represent and which tradeoffs you prefer. It seems that HTMX is primarily based in the Python ecosystem and as a former Pythonista I see the advantage of having a DSL over having to write JS, especially that the former is much narrower, which is what you want in this situation.

Recommends View on HN
@namelosw2019-05 · in “Virtual DOM is pure overhead (2018)”

React is more like 'Lambda the Ultimate Web Component'. A component is almost a function returns element. Expanding a component is like calling a function and give it the property. So you can have some abstract common behavior in HOC f and g, then you can have HOC `h = compose(f(g))`. A quick comparison with Angular: @Component({template, style}) seems composable if we stretch a lot. But why make template and style in the decorator... They are not something we consider most abstract at all. The function is the simplest yet composable abstraction over the template, Cheng Lou also has a really excellent talk on the topic: ▶ this video

Recommends View on HN
@rk062018-04 · in “Ask HN: What is your favourite tech talk?”

The spectrum of abstraction: ▶ this video This is an high level talk. it guides on how to choose between competing solutions to a problem when the commonly accepted answer is "it depends"

Recommends View on HN
@Rygu2016-09 · in “On DRY and the cost of wrongful abstractions”

For a more visual explanation of the "cost of abstractions" watch this presentation by Cheng Lou (Facebook). ▶ this video

Recommends View on HN