Meaningful Play: Getting Gamification Right
Google TechTalks3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2012–2014
talk · intermediate · 2012–2014 on HN
A Google Tech Talk by Sebastian Deterding on gamification. It looks at what points and badges get wrong and what lessons game design offers for non-game applications.
HN commenters recommend it as a thoughtful take on doing gamification and game design well.
Up next
6 mo on HN"Transducers" by Rich Hickey
Strange Loop Conference
6 HN recommender · 2014–2025
6 mo on HNJonathan Blow: Video Games and the Human Condition
rubbermuck
6 HN recommender · 2011–2017
7 mo on HNThe Banach–Tarski Paradox
Vsauce
6 HN recommender · 2015–2024
4 mo on HNSalman Khan TED Talk 2011 (from ted.com)
Khan Academy
4 HN recommender · 2011–2012
3 mo on HNLec 1 | MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010
MIT OpenCourseWare
3 HN recommender · 2017–2018
2 mo on HNReading Silicon: How to Reverse Engineer Integrated Circuits
HACKADAY
2 HN recommender · 2018–2021
3 mo on HN17. Succinct Structures I
MIT OpenCourseWare
3 HN recommender · 2018–2022
4 mo on HNAlan Kay - Programming and Scaling
Colin McDonnell
4 HN recommender · 2016–2026
12 mo on HNJuice it or lose it - a talk by Martin Jonasson & Petri Purho
grapefrukt
12 HN recommender · 2013–2025
11 mo on HNJan Willem Nijman - Vlambeer - "The art of screenshake" at INDIGO Classes 2013
Dutch Game Garden
10 HN recommender · 2014–2025
12 mo on HNPreventing the Collapse of Civilization / Jonathan Blow (Thekla, Inc)
DevGAMM
14 HN recommender · 2020–2025
8 mo on HNFailing to Fail: The Spiderweb Software Way
GDC Festival of Gaming
11 HN recommender · 2018–2025
3 comments from Hacker News
I'd argue that all 'games' are about manipulating attention - its just a question of what means they use to do so. Game design is really a sort of meta-game about designing systems that effect the behavior of players. Consider: Game Mechanics and Mechanism Design ( link ) I'm fully with you on the notion that we shouldn't be manipulating players life like farmville. Johnathan blow put on a great talk about games and the human condition where he covers this aspect quite scathingly: link To completely ignore this aspect is to develop a game with no real-stickyness factor. Money aside, don't you want a game that people enjoy playing? The entire point of an MMO is to have a large reoccurring user-base. There is an art to it, and getting it right can make really powerful games: ▶ this video For board games like chess, much of the appeal for the average player is that you get to sit down with a friend and compete, and in doing so the 'intellectual nature' of the game ends up pulling them in for the long term. Perhaps the answer to the meta-game of stickiness is to create a community around the game in a similar vein to the one from the ants ai challenge's forums. Were I to work on this project, I'd make a strong push toward git-like integration ala the work done behind KhanAcademy's live editor like discussed in this talk: link . - being able to share code behaviors with your team-mates (you are going to implement a guilds system, no?) and encourage discussions about behaviors at
The concept is very interesting.. But this is a bad introduction =( Saw a presentation a while ago that hooked me, can't watch it now, but think it was this one: ▶ this video link
There is so much truth packed into that 36 mins -- so many juxtapositions -- it would take several hours to reference them all. For starters, see Rich Hickey's talk on "Hammock-Driven Development" for more on the "background mind" ( link ), and then see how what Dan Pink is saying about motivation ( link ) and what Sebastian Deterding is saying about gamification ( ▶ this video ) all connect into what Cleese is saying about creativity.