Coronavirus Update 98: Rapid COVID 19 Antigen Testing at Home - A Possible Breakthrough
MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020–2021
lecture · general · 2020–2021 on HN
MedCram's Dr. Roger Seheult summarizes a discussion with Dr. Michael Mina on cheap, paper-based at-home COVID-19 antigen tests. It explains why lower sensitivity can still work well for screening infectious people.
Pointed to in 2020 testing threads for a visual explanation of why rapid antigen tests still serve a purpose.
Up next
12 mo on HNSugar: THE BITTER TRUTH
University of California Television (UCTV)
13 HN recommender · 2010–2024
11 mo on HNWe Were Taught to Call Death a Blessing
CGP Grey
12 HN recommender · 2018–2025
9 mo on HNDr. Michael Greger | How Not To Die | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
8 HN recommender · 2016–2022
9 mo on HNWhy Some Diseases Only Traveled One Direction
CGP Grey
11 HN recommender · 2015–2024
8 mo on HNSunlight: Optimize Health and Immunity (Light Therapy and Melatonin)
MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY
6 HN recommender · 2022–2024
8 mo on HNDr. Jason Fung - 'Therapeutic Fasting - Solving the Two-Compartment Problem'
Low Carb Down Under
7 HN recommender · 2017–2022
7 mo on HNMinding your mitochondria | Dr. Terry Wahls | TEDxIowaCity
TEDx Talks
7 HN recommender · 2011–2022
6 mo on HNWhy We Get Fat: And What to Do About It | Gary Taubes | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
6 HN recommender · 2011–2022
5 mo on HNFasting For Survival Lecture by Dr Pradip Jamnadas
The Galen Foundation
6 HN recommender · 2021–2025
7 mo on HNThe Epidemic of Fake Disease
Medlife Crisis
7 HN recommender · 2020–2026
6 mo on HN"Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers: Stress and Health" by Dr. Robert Sapolsky
Beckman Institute at Illinois
5 HN recommender · 2019–2025
5 mo on HNI Found The Source of the Coronavirus
laowhy86
6 HN recommender · 2020–2023
3 comments from Hacker News
> But if the rapid tests are as unreliable in general as they were for me, it’s sort of no wonder COVID is spreading like wildfire. Many rapid tests are indeed not accurate[1] but they still serve a purpose, depending on the sensitivity and specificity of the tests[2]. For the rapid tests with high sensitivity and you get a positive result, it's highly likely you have COVID. For the rapid tests with high specificity and you get a negative result, it's highly likely that you don't have COVID. And the public health measures of testing / contact tracing ONLY works if testing results come back quick. PCR tests are neither fast nor cheap, so those are not as effective in prevention of spreading because you don't do those all the time (slow + expensive). Medcram has a good video talking about this. [3] [1]: link [2]: link [3]: ▶ this video
Right - see the MedCram lectures on the topic: How to Beat COVID-19 with At-Home, Rapid Result Testing: 5 Min. Summary by Dr. Mina (Antigen Tests) link Coronavirus Pandemic Update 98: At Home COVID-19 Testing - A Possible Breakthrough (~ 15 min) ▶ this video At Home, Cheap, COVID-19 Tests with Results in 15 Minutes: How to Fix Testing with Dr. Michael Mina (~ 1 hr) link
The visual explanation of the ideas and concepts presented there, also mentioned in the later podcast: Medcram: “Coronavirus Pandemic Update 98: At Home COVID-19 Testing - A Possible Breakthrough” ▶ this video Also, regarding the Ct value, from: “Interpreting the COVID-19 Test Results: a Guide for Physiatrists” link In PCR tests “the diagnosis is made based on the threshold cycle (Ct) value. Ct is defined as the cycle number when the sample fluorescence exceeds a chosen threshold above the calculated background fluorescence.5 In other words, the lower the Ct value of a specific gene, the more the gene exists in the sample. However, the problem with a Ct-based diagnosis is that there is no absolute or constant Ct cut-off value, and Ct cut-off values are different for each diagnostic reagent even for the same gene.”