The Bayesian Trap
Veritasium2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2017–2024
explainer · general · evergreen · 2017–2024 on HN
Veritasium explains Bayes' theorem with examples and introduces the 'Bayesian trap', where repeated events get mistaken for inevitable ones. It discusses how priors shape our expectations and behavior.
HN points to it as an accessible introduction to Bayesian reasoning and as inspiration for personal projects.
Up next
3 mo on HNDr Russell Barkley on ADHD Meds and how they all work differently from each other
Adhd Videos
3 HN recommender · 2018–2024
8 mo on HNIs Most Published Research Wrong?
Veritasium
8 HN recommender · 2017–2025
9 mo on HNThis is how you treat ADHD based off science, Dr Russell Barkley part of 2012 Burnett Lecture
Adhd Videos
10 HN recommender · 2015–2025
9 mo on HNWhy Some Diseases Only Traveled One Direction
CGP Grey
11 HN recommender · 2015–2024
5 mo on HNOpioids: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
5 HN recommender · 2016–2024
7 mo on HNMountainWest RubyConf 2013 Devs and Depression by Greg Baugues
Confreaks
7 HN recommender · 2013–2020
9 mo on HNWhy Being Delusional is a Superpower
Veritasium
9 HN recommender · 2020–2024
10 mo on HNWhy Your Vote Doesn't Count
CGP Grey
10 HN recommender · 2015–2025
8 mo on HNOnce you understand game theory, you understand the world.
Veritasium
10 HN recommender · 2023–2026
7 mo on HNThe Voting System That Should Replace Every Election
CGP Grey
7 HN recommender · 2012–2021
5 mo on HNgolden balls. the weirdest split or steal ever!
spinout3
5 HN recommender · 2012–2025
5 mo on HNHow lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy Explained
Stand-up Maths
5 HN recommender · 2021–2025
4 comments from Hacker News
Another problem for the less familiar with the Bayes theorem is what is described as the "Bayesian trap", explained by the youtuber Veritasium: ▶ this video
Definitely. Another good idea is to show the difference between reality and data can be overwhelmingly significant. Videos demonstrating this with examples: - "The Bayesian Trap" ▶ this video - "Is Most Research Wrong?" link
Inspired by this Veritasium video: ▶ this video I'm working on a journal that incorporates Bayesian learning on how aspects of my life affect my mental, physical and social well-being. Having used it for nearly 500 days I plan to turn it into a life accounting and auditing tool. link
So, in order to do your job of maintaining your health , you need need to do all of these jobs: 1. Learn about the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of your health problem 2. Assess the severity of the health problem 3. Learn about the experience of other people 4. Get multiple opinions Bonus: 5. Learn about multiple valid solutions 6. Find doctor's blind spots While doing all that, you pay for healthcare, which includes all that. You pay a doctor to know no1, do the no2, remember no3. You then pay for multiple of them to do the same. But then you still get to the point where you have to decide who to believe. And it would be easy if 4 of them say the same thing. You can be pretty sure they are right[1] because statistics. But what happens when they give multiple differing opinions, like here [2]. [1] ▶ this video [2] link