Why Can't We Have Nice Things with Ezra Klein | The Weekly Show
The Weekly Show with Jon StewartCited 4× on HN, 2025–2025
podcast · general · 2025–2025 on HN
Jon Stewart interviews Ezra Klein about his book Abundance and why progressive goals get stuck in procedure and regulation. They discuss how to streamline government and what could be built without bureaucratic obstacles.
Cited as a source of examples such as California high-speed rail and rural broadband subsidies when HN discusses government dysfunction.
Up next
12 mo on HNGeorge Lakoff: Moral Politics
University of California Television (UCTV)
3 HN recommender · 2016–2024
11 mo on HNWhy Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea
Tom Scott
11 HN recommender · 2020–2026
11 mo on HNRepublic, Lost | Lawrence Lessig | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
10 HN recommender · 2011–2017
11 mo on HNAntonin Scalia - On American Exceptionalism
AmericanRhetoric.com
12 HN recommender · 2019–2025
10 mo on HNThe Cardboard Box Reform - Nixon's Ghost Bill & A Crucial Flaw in Democracy
CRI
9 HN recommender · 2014–2025
10 mo on HNThe Coming Collapse of the Middle Class with Elizabeth Warren
University of California Television (UCTV)
10 HN recommender · 2008–2022
9 mo on HNWe the People, and the Republic we must reclaim | Lawrence Lessig
TED
8 HN recommender · 2013–2026
10 mo on HNWhy Your Vote Doesn't Count
CGP Grey
10 HN recommender · 2015–2025
8 mo on HNMay 1, 1969: Fred Rogers testifies before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications
Road Less Marveled
9 HN recommender · 2015–2026
7 mo on HNThe Voting System That Should Replace Every Election
CGP Grey
7 HN recommender · 2012–2021
7 mo on HNThe Voting System That's Actually Too Good for Politicians to Allow
CGP Grey
7 HN recommender · 2015–2021
6 mo on HNWhy Electronic Voting is a BAD Idea - Computerphile
Computerphile
7 HN recommender · 2015–2025
4 comments from Hacker News
We got an overview of those "efforts" a few months back and it was both comical and enraging to hear how much money and time was wasted. And this was a law+process crafted by Democrats, signed by a Democrat President, and presided over by a Democrat Administration.. they had all the pieces in place to accomplish their goals. Ref: ▶ this video When you have tons of paperwork and ZERO deployments (not exaggerating), there's nothing to revert.. just a lot to be disappointed by.
The overall impression I get of such projects is that politicians celebrate the funding victory, and then forget about it. Then the project's funds get eaten up by administrative costs over time. Ezra Klien [1] recently highlighted two such examples: high speed rail in CA, and rural broadband subsidies. Personally, I haven't seen much, if anything, actually spent out of Biden's infrastructure bill. The money from these programs just seems to...vanish. Allowing this to happen undermines the idea that the USG is a trustworthy spender of our money. I would personally prefer it if political success wasn't just grabbing more budget, but actually overseeing successful execution of public projects. 1 - ▶ this video
California contracting in particular is built not of penurious individual corruption, but of systemic corruption. The lowest bid must win, and nobody has the political capital to establish a bidding system that works, so dramatic systematic underbidding + cost overruns is the rule, and is expected by all parties except the naive public. Couple that with the kind of "Build nothing if any single problem can be detacted", 'Cheems mindset' failures of liberalism, and high-pressure demands from a federal government whose legislators are eager to sabotage projects outside of purple states. link ▶ this video
"investments into significant infra programs might be another, even with long time horizons." - yes, really long horizons. case in point - ▶ this video "it arguably did not take any actions that directly make life worse for the average person." - I don't think you've talked to an average person. They are quite upset. "you are rooting for people who are directly working against your own economic interest" - No actually. They have a plan and they have articulated it. It may not work in the end, but it is not a forgone conclusion. And they are most definitely striving to help the average person. link , link .